Problem statement
CNG auto-rickshaws are a major form of local public transport in Sylhet. This project asks a compact planning question: are three flexible stands along the Temuki–Bondor Bazar corridor positioned reasonably under selected demand, cost, road-width and junction criteria, or do alternative corridor locations score better?
The project is intentionally framed as a computational methodology demonstration rather than a deployment-ready transport recommendation.
Real spatial inputs
AHP weighting + constrained GA search
Weight four criteria
Demand, cost, road width and junction proximity are weighted using pairwise comparisons and the eigenvector method. The reported consistency ratio is 0.0292.
Generate candidates
Create 100 candidate locations along the real corridor using Haversine distance and linear interpolation.
Evaluate each location
Compute criterion scores from landmark proximity, cost-tier anchors, road-width classes and junction distances.
Select three flexible stands
Optimize locations with hard constraints of at least 400 m spacing between stands and at least 75 m clearance from junctions.
Key finding
The GA placed its nearest alternative to Rikabi Bazar only 69 m away, indicating that the existing location is close to the optimized result even though its baseline AHP score was the lowest among the existing flexible stands. In contrast, GA-suggested alternatives for Modina Market and Pathantula were each more than 1.2 km away, indicating potential relocation opportunities within the assumptions of this model.
Limitations
Demand and cost are proximity-based proxies rather than measured ridership and land-value data. Road width is simplified into a two-tier segment model, and junction proximity simplifies a more complex safety relationship. Therefore the outputs demonstrate the AHP–GA workflow; they should not be interpreted as an operational transport-planning recommendation without field validation and stronger behavioral/economic data.