Published research

Modeling long-term chromium migration from the Rajbandh open landfill

A coupled groundwater-flow and contaminant-transport study built to quantify how chromium may migrate through a data-scarce, multilayer aquifer system on the urban fringe of Khulna, Bangladesh.

Water Practice & Technology · 2026 First & corresponding author MODFLOW-2005 · MT3DMS · ModelMuse · ArcGIS

Why this study was needed

Rajbandh is an open, unlined landfill in Jalma Union near Khulna City. The site receives a major portion of the municipal solid waste generated by Khulna City Corporation, while the surrounding urban fringe is undergoing land-use change and depends on groundwater for domestic and other uses. Leachate migration therefore raises a practical question that short-term sampling alone cannot answer: where could contamination move over decades?

Research gap. The published study identifies this work as the first calibrated contaminant-transport model for the Rajbandh landfill site. Earlier work documented environmental contamination in and around the area, but no calibrated site-specific transport model had quantified long-term chromium plume migration and clay-layer breakthrough.

The challenge was also methodological. The site is data-scarce, monitoring wells are limited, and the subsurface is not a single homogeneous aquifer. The modeling framework therefore had to combine available field observations with a multilayer conceptualization while keeping the simulated transport assumptions explicit.

50.82 km²Jalma Union model domain
5 layershydrostratigraphic framework
50 × 50 mfinite-difference grid resolution
32,277cells per model layer

Research questions

The model was designed around a set of linked hydrogeologic questions rather than a software exercise:

  • How does the chromium-affected area evolve over a multi-decadal simulation?
  • How does the local groundwater-flow field control plume direction?
  • How strongly does layer-wise hydraulic conductivity affect migration between clay and sand units?
  • How long does the upper clay aquitard delay the selected chromium threshold from reaching the underlying sand aquifer?
  • Can a calibrated MODFLOW–MT3DMS framework provide a defensible baseline for groundwater-risk assessment in a monitoring-limited setting?

Study area & data foundation

The Rajbandh landfill is located in Jalma Union, Batiaghata Upazila, immediately outside the southwest boundary of Khulna City Corporation. The landfill itself occupies approximately 0.074 km²; the broader modeling domain covers about 50.82 km².

Spatial and hydrogeologic inputs were assembled to define surface elevation, model boundaries, aquifer layering, hydraulic properties, recharge and groundwater-flow conditions. Field chromium measurements were subsequently used to calibrate and evaluate the transport simulation.

ArcGIS was used for spatial preparation and visualization, while ModelMuse provided the graphical environment for constructing the MODFLOW and MT3DMS models.

Study area map of Rajbandh landfill and Jalma Union
Study area and Rajbandh landfill location used in the model.

Representing a multilayer subsurface

A central modeling decision was to represent the site with layer-specific hydraulic properties, rather than applying one uniform conductivity to the entire subsurface. The conceptual model contains two sandy aquifers separated and bounded by lower-permeability aquitards.

Upper clay aquitard1–35 mK = 0.91 m/dSy = 0.0927
1st aquifer35–100 mK = 7.35 m/dSy = 0.14
Middle silty aquitard100–150 mK = 1.25 m/dSy = 0.12
2nd aquifer150–270 mK = 5.00 m/dSy = 0.1238
Bottom clay aquitard270–325 mK = 0.42 m/dSy = 0.0586
LayerDepth (m)Hydraulic conductivity (m/d)Specific storage (1/m)Specific yield
Upper clay aquitard1–350.914.94×10⁻⁴0.0927
1st aquifer35–1007.351.35×10⁻⁴0.14
Middle silty aquitard100–1501.252.30×10⁻⁴0.12
2nd aquifer150–2705.002.12×10⁻⁴0.1238
Bottom clay aquitard270–3250.427.98×10⁻⁴0.0586
Why this matters: the first sandy aquifer has a hydraulic conductivity about 8.1 times that of the upper clay aquitard (7.35 vs. 0.91 m/d). That contrast becomes one of the clearest controls on the simulated plume footprint.
Hydrostratigraphic representation used for the groundwater model
Hydrostratigraphic representation used to define the multilayer groundwater system.

Coupled numerical modeling framework

The study separated the problem into groundwater flow and solute transport. MODFLOW-2005 simulated groundwater flow from 2010 to 2050, and MT3DMS simulated chromium transport from 2017 to 2050. ModelMuse was used to construct and manage the finite-difference model, and ArcGIS was used for spatial outputs and contamination mapping.

The transport simulation used a deliberately conservative formulation focused on advection and hydrodynamic dispersion. Geochemical reactions, sorption and other reactive processes were not represented in the published transport model. This keeps the physical assumptions transparent and avoids attributing simulated retardation to chemistry that was not modeled.

Groundwater and contaminant transport modeling workflow
Flow-to-transport workflow used in the study.
ModelMuse model grid and layer setup
Model construction and vertical discretization in ModelMuse.
Advection dominated chromium plume pattern
Modeled plume orientation relative to the simulated velocity field.

Calibration against observed chromium

The transport model was first run through 2025 and calibrated against observed chromium concentrations. Longitudinal dispersivity was adjusted during calibration, after which the full transport simulation was extended through 2050.

Published model evaluation: simulated and observed Cr concentrations showed a satisfactory fit with R² = 0.89.

The thesis development file contains a slightly different preliminary regression value; this portfolio uses the final published article as the authoritative value.

Observed versus modeled chromium concentration calibration plot
Observed-versus-modeled Cr concentration comparison used for model evaluation.

Groundwater flow establishes the transport pathway

The published results describe a local groundwater-flow direction from south to north. The study links this localized pattern to groundwater abstraction in the direction of Khulna City, which lowers hydraulic head in the northern part of the model domain.

The flow simulation also projects a progressive decline in average dry-season groundwater level over the 2010–2050 period, adding a dynamic hydraulic context for the transport analysis.

Modeled groundwater flow direction
Modeled groundwater-flow direction across the study area.
Projected dry season groundwater elevation changes
Projected dry-season groundwater-level change across the flow simulation period.

Thirty-three years of plume evolution

The most direct long-term result is the expansion of the sand-aquifer area above the selected chromium threshold. The affected footprint increases from 0.15 km² after one year to 0.66 km² after 33 years.

The plume is elongated along the groundwater-flow path, consistent with an advection-dominated transport regime. Dispersion contributes longitudinal and transverse spreading, while advective groundwater movement controls the principal direction of migration.

Hydraulic conductivity controls the contrast between clay and sand

The study directly compared the affected areas in the upper clay layer and the first sand aquifer. Because the sand unit has much higher hydraulic conductivity, its modeled contamination footprint expands more rapidly and remains substantially larger through the simulation.

Sand
0.66
Clay
0.31
Modeled timeClay affected area (km²)Sand affected area (km²)Sand relative to clay
1 year0.0810.1585% larger
8 years0.120.32167% larger
13 years0.160.41156% larger
23 years0.240.55129% larger
33 years0.310.66113% larger

Modeled clay-layer breakthrough: approximately 20 years

The breakthrough analysis tracks when the selected chromium concentration threshold is reached in the underlying sand aquifer. Under the study assumptions, the model identifies a breakthrough time of approximately 20 years for the 0.05 mg/L threshold used in the study.

Interpretation: this is a modeled physical-transport result for the study configuration—not evidence that chemical sorption was simulated. The low permeability of the clay unit reduces advective transport relative to the sand aquifer.
Clay layer breakthrough analysis chart
Breakthrough-time analysis used to identify the approximately 20-year threshold crossing.

Long-term projection of affected area

The final published paper reports that the temporal expansion of the affected area is represented effectively by a second-order polynomial trend with R² = 0.9988. The final peer-reviewed formulation is reported here rather than an earlier projection explored during thesis development.

Source hierarchy used on this page: when the thesis-development document and the final journal article differ, the published article is treated as the authoritative version of the reported result.

Limitations & what the model does not claim

The study is useful precisely because its constraints are explicit. The main limitations reported in the thesis and final paper include:

  • Limited groundwater monitoring records and lack of a continuous time-series dataset.
  • Concentration calibration based on a small number of observation wells.
  • Insufficient monitoring information to calibrate groundwater-flow velocity as robustly as desired.
  • Uncertainty in model boundary conditions, recharge and evapotranspiration representation.
  • Layer-wise hydraulic conductivity, specific yield and specific storage were represented, while some other properties were simplified.
  • No explicit geochemical reactions or reactive-transport processes were included.

Accordingly, the results are best interpreted as a calibrated physical transport framework and a baseline for improved monitoring and future reactive/uncertainty modeling—not as a complete geochemical description of chromium fate.

My contribution & research significance

The published author-contribution statement credits me with conceptualization, methodology, software modeling, data curation, and writing the original draft, with the work supervised and reviewed by Professor Md. Saiful Islam.

For me, the main value of this study is methodological: it required moving from an environmental question to a hydrostratigraphic conceptual model, translating that conceptualization into a numerical grid, coupling groundwater flow with solute transport, calibrating the simulation against field observations, analyzing spatial plume behavior, and carrying the work through peer review.

R² 0.89published Cr model evaluation
8.1×K contrast: sand vs. upper clay
340%increase from 0.15 to 0.66 km²
1stcalibrated Rajbandh contaminant-transport model reported by the article